Skip to content

Random Connections

A collection of photography and exploration focusing on Upstate South Carolina and beyond.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Photos
  • Resources
  • Other Voices
  • Post Archives
  • Podcast
  • Home
  • Gear
  • i-GotU GT-120 Final Thoughts

i-GotU GT-120 Final Thoughts

Posted on May 27, 2009 By Tom 1 Comment on i-GotU GT-120 Final Thoughts
Gear, Geocaching and Maps, Photography

Qstarz comparison

As I stated in my last post, the i-GotU GT-120 was a pleasant surprise. The unit functions much better than the GT-100 that I purchased and returned last year. It geotagged images accurately from my little Nikon S50 camera. However, in my last tests I ran into some puzzling problems – not with the GT-120 but with my QStarz BT-1000 and also with my big Nikon D50 DSLR. Where both had worked together accurately for quite awhile now, neither was able to get a geotagged image – the D50 with either GPS tracker, and the BT-1000 with either camera. More tests were needed. The problems appeared to be related to incorrect time-codes, so I started from that basis.

Before I got started with the comparison tests, I did another quick test of the GT-120. On Monday I kept it in my pocket all day. The unit was able to track my location the entire time. Another good sign for the GT-120.

For my first comparison test I set up my Nikon S50 in interval mode, shooting one shot every 30 seconds, and placed it on my dashboard for the drive home from work. I put the GT-120 and the BT-1000 on the dash beside the camera. When I got home I made two sets of the images and downloaded the GPS tracks from both units. The GT-120 geotagged the images with no problem. The BT-1000, however, placed all of the images at the very end of the track.

An examination of the GPS track showed me that the BT-1000 had never reset for Daylight Savings Time. Fortunately, the accompanying software has a time-shift utility. Once I shifted the photos back an hour, it located the images accurately. The image below shows both the GT-120 and the BT-1000 images as located in Google Earth.

GE_Screen_Shot

Of course, this was still with my little point and shoot Nikon. All of this would be for naught if I couldn’t get it to work with my DSLR. For the second test I double-checked the time on the D50, and sure enough, IT had never been reset for Daylight Savings Time. That’s why the GT-120 couldn’t find any of its images on my earlier test run. The clock was not off by an exact hour, so a when I did a one-hour time shift in my previous test, it was able to geo-locate the image, but not accurately. I set the clock on the D50 to match the S50, and set off for one final test.

As with previous tests I placed the GT-120 and the BT-1000 side-by-side on my dash board and drove to work – the exact same route as the previous test. This time I took random photos out the window with my DSLR. I made sure that I took pictures of intersections and easily recognized landmarks, such as overpasses, so that I could gauge accuracy of both GPS trackers.

With the clock reset on the DSLR, the GT-120 was able to accurately geo-locate the photos without any problems. The BT-1000 was able to locate the images, but only after I had done a one-hour time shift for Daylight Savings Time. There were some discrepancies, though. The BT-1000 did tend to place the images closer to their actual location. The GT-120 had more images that were slightly off. I think this might be due to the update settings on both units. The BT-1000 was taking a location reading every 5 seconds, and the GT-120 was taking one every 6 seconds. That might be enough to throw things off if you want pinpoint accuracy at highway speeds, but not enough to cause problems while walking around with your camera. Fortunately, this setting can be changed on both units.

The image below shows the results of the Nikon D50 tracks from the GT-120 and BT-1000 in Google Earth…

D50_GE_Test

After running all of the tests, I downloaded a new update for the BT-1000 software. The new version does include a check box for Daylight Savings Time. I’ll just have to remember to occasionally check the time on my camera, and to reset it with the time change.

So, which one of these GPS trackers will I use? Not sure for now. The i-GotU is certainly smaller and more convenient. Now that accuracy for both cameras is not an issue, I’ll probably alternate using both trackers. The software for each has similar capabilities, both can output a GPX file, both can output to Google Earth (although the BT-1000 creates smaller KMZ files), and both seem to have similar battery life. The main advantage of the BT-1000 is Bluetooth, and that’s not a feature I use. Right now, it’s a toss up, but I’m glad I’ve got options.

Tags: Gadgets GPS gps tracking i-gotU

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: i-GotU Revisited
Next Post: Google Web Elements ❯

One thought on “i-GotU GT-120 Final Thoughts”

  1. RichyRich says:
    August 4, 2009 at 8:09 am

    Hi Tom,

    I’ve have recently purchased a GT-120 and after reading your thorough review I was wondering if you could clarify something for me.

    I conducted a quick test of the GT-120 by driving round my local business park with a 3sec interval set on the unit. When I viewed this within Google Earth the track wasn’t particularly accurate (e.g. it ran through buildings, I started/stopped at the exact same parking space but this wasn’t reflected on the map).

    I reset the unit to a 1sec interval, which improved the situation only slightly (the start/stop point again didn’t match, ran through buildings etc.).

    Admittedly the day was overcast and raining but when you describe the fact that you managed to get a signal with the unit in your pocket, that shouldn’t be an issue – what am I missing e.g. do you leave the unit x minutes before starting off, tweak the waypoints afterwards etc.? Any advice would be much appreciated.

    All the best, Rich

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • EdTech (197)
  • Entertainment (201)
  • Family (123)
  • Gear (114)
  • General Technology (98)
  • Geocaching and Maps (208)
  • History and Genealogy (275)
  • Internet (141)
  • Local (458)
  • Miscellaneous (557)
  • Music (202)
  • Paddling (265)
  • Photography (781)
  • Podcast (16)
  • Rambling (233)
  • Rants (161)
  • Recipes (36)
  • Religion (48)
  • Restaurants (165)
  • Science (48)
  • Things Overheard (29)
  • Travel (413)
  • Uncategorized (143)
  • Washington Sabbatical (113)
  • Weirdness (59)

Recent Posts

  • Carolina Ghost Towns – Paper Towns
  • Kayaking on Wolf Creek Lake
  • Carolina Ghost Towns – Colonial Dorchester
  • Six Layer Bourbon Grits Bowl
  • How’s the House? Part 2

Recent Comments

  • Eric Kincaid on Kayaking and Coffee
  • Daniel S Mawn on Remembering the Walke
  • Judy Hall on The Clock on Wade Hampton
  • Charles Johnson on In Search of the Road Builder
  • Anthony h hannig on From Kingsbury to Stoneboro – Rambling in Lancaster County

Tags

blogging cemetery Christmas Columbia Edisto River edtech Entertainment family Flickr Florida Furman Furman University gear Georgia geotagging Ghost Town Ghost Towns Google Earth Google Maps GPS Greenville Greenville Chorale history Instructional Technology kayaking Lake Jocassee LCU Lowcountry Unfiltered maps Music North Carolina Paddling Photography rambling restaurant Restaurants review singing social networking South Carolina time-lapse Travel video Washington Washington State
June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Copyright © 2025 Random Connections.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown