Skip to content

Random Connections

A collection of photography and exploration focusing on Upstate South Carolina and beyond.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Photos
  • Resources
  • Other Voices
  • Post Archives
  • Home
  • EdTech
  • Boards versus Tablets

Boards versus Tablets

Posted on February 15, 2007 By Tom No Comments on Boards versus Tablets
EdTech, Gear

It would seem that interactive smart boards are the latest thing to sweep the EdTech world. Whether it be a SMARTboard, Promethean Board, or some other brand, districts in our area are racing to put these into every classroom, along with an accompanying projection system.

I have mixed feelings about these investments. I was roundly criticized (mainly by vendors of these types of boards) for not including them in the design plans of our newest schools. However, we have had this technology in our schools since 1996. In the intervening ten years I’ve seen an initial flurry as the devices are introduced, then I see usage dropping off. At this point most of ours are being used as glorified computer mice, or, worse yet, simple projection screens.

Don’t get me wrong. If used properly, this can be a wonderful tool for the classroom. However, if not used properly it’s just an expensive waste. If it’s permanently mounted, as these vendors suggested, then it’s a permanent reminder of that waste, as well.

Here’s where interactive tablets come into play. I have just purchased one InterWrite SchoolPad for our district office, and I’m getting ready to purchase a bunch more for the district. Hitachi and Dukane also make these products, but so far InterWrite seems to be the best. The tablets have the same basic functionality as the interactive boards, but they score over the boards on several points.

  • The size of the tablet does not restrict the size of the display. With white boards, you are limited to the size you purchase. The same tablet can scale from a small projected image to a huge auditorium-sized projection.
  • Tablets don’t require calibration like white boards. Each time we used a SMARTBoard, we would have to go up and tap a series of dots to calibrate the display. The tablets have an automatic 1-to-1 correlation between the tablet and the computer’s resolution.
  • With tablets you aren’t standing in front of the image for the blocking the rest of the class.  Neither are you trying to stare down a 2000 lumen lamp every time you turn around.
  • Tablets work with any projection device and monitor. Since the device connects via BlueTooth to the computer, the display type is irrelavent. I’ve used it with scan converters (although with not-so-great results) and just the computer’s monitor. LCD projection is best, though.
  • The tablets are extremely portable, and can be moved where needed more readily. There is much greater versitility than with the boards.
  • Tablets are about 1/3 the cost of interactive white boards. That in and of itself should clench the deal.

There are a couple of advantages that the boards have.

  • With the boards, you are writing and interacting directly with the displayed image, rather than trying to get the pad to match what’s going on with the screen. This could be confusing, especially for younger kids.
  • You can use your fingers as a mouse on the boards, allowing a tactile component not possible with the tablets.

Other than these, though, I see no advantage. I guess I’ll get a better idea how these will work once I get the new ones for the district and we have training with our teachers. I’m just hoping that these doesn’t just turn into expensive mice, too.

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Popping the Question 21st Century Style
Next Post: Hauntings of South Carolina ❯

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

  • EdTech (200)
  • Entertainment (201)
  • Family (120)
  • Gear (115)
  • General Technology (99)
  • Geocaching and Maps (208)
  • History and Genealogy (260)
  • Internet (144)
  • Local (449)
  • Miscellaneous (544)
  • Music (194)
  • Paddling (245)
  • Photography (779)
  • Podcast (6)
  • Rambling (226)
  • Rants (160)
  • Recipes (34)
  • Religion (48)
  • Restaurants (165)
  • Science (48)
  • Things Overheard (29)
  • Travel (410)
  • Uncategorized (129)
  • Washington Sabbatical (113)
  • Weirdness (60)

Recent Posts

  • Wilkinsville and a Mystery Church
  • A Farewell to the Greenville Chorale
  • Edisto River from Good Hope to Sullivan’s Landing
  • Paddling Lake Monticello
  • The Remnants of the City

Recent Comments

  • Nancy on About Us
  • Steve Rushton on Mysterious Mayucha and The Wolf Pit
  • Tom on Finding Irish Music in South Carolina
  • Rachel B on Finding Irish Music in South Carolina
  • Kim Atchley on Journey to Nazareth

Tags

blogging cemetery Christmas Columbia Edisto River edtech Entertainment family Flickr Florida Furman Furman University gear Georgia geotagging Ghost Town Ghost Towns Google Earth Google Maps GPS Greenville Greenville Chorale history Instructional Technology kayaking Lake Jocassee LCU Lowcountry Unfiltered maps Music North Carolina Paddling Photography rambling restaurant Restaurants review singing social networking South Carolina time-lapse Travel video Washington Washington State
June 2022
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May    

Copyright © 2022 Random Connections.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown